

The National Prosecuting Authority says Vusimuzi "Cat" Matlala's decision to withdraw from his plea and sentence agreement will not weaken its corruption case. Image: X
NPA
1Min
South Africa
NPA confident in corruption case after Vusimuzi Matlala withdraws plea deal
The National Prosecuting Authority says Vusimuzi "Cat" Matlala's decision to withdraw from his plea and sentence agreement will not weaken its corruption case, insisting it has enough evidence to prosecute all 17 accused.
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has confirmed it will proceed with its corruption case against businessman Vusimuzi "Cat" Matlala and his 16 co-accused after he withdrew from a plea and sentence agreement.
Matlala had previously pleaded guilty to charges linked to the Medicare 24 Tshwane District contract and was separated from his co-accused after entering into negotiations with the State. However, the plea agreement has now fallen away after the proposed sentence was rejected by the Specialised Commercial Crimes Court in Pretoria.
In a statement on Monday the NPA said that the magistrate rejected the proposed sentence and suggested that Matlala should instead receive a 12-year prison term. The matter was initially postponed to allow both parties to consider the court's proposal.
Following Matlala's decision to withdraw from the agreement, the plea deal has been declared null and void. He will now rejoin his 16 co-accused when the matter returns to court on 11 September 2026.
The NPA said the plea negotiations originated after Matlala voluntarily approached the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) seeking to conclude a plea agreement. Discussions were subsequently held between his legal representatives and the State.
Despite the collapse of the agreement, the NPA maintains that its case remains strong.
"We hold the firm view that his withdrawal will not negatively impact the IDAC's case against the 17 accused as we believe there is sufficient evidence to sustain the charges preferred against all the accused in this matter," said National Director of Public Prosecutions Advocate Andy Mothibi.
Mothibi explained that plea and sentence agreements are recognised legal mechanisms used to avoid lengthy trials while securing cooperation from accused persons and obtaining evidence that may not otherwise be readily available.
"It is certainly not an indication of the State's lack of confidence in its case. The IDAC is now focusing on ensuring that the pending trial proceeds without hindrance," he said.
Meanwhile, the NPA also addressed the absence of IDAC head Advocate Andrea Johnson from the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry.
Mothibi said Johnson had been scheduled to appear before the commission but was unable to do so due to ill health.
He urged members of the public to allow the commission to continue its work without interference.









