Ethics complaint highlights leadership challenges at Department of Social Development

The Democratic Alliance has lodged an ethics complaint against Minister of Social Development Sisisi Tolashe, claiming she misled Parliament regarding the employment term of the department’s director-general, Peter Netshipale. The complaint casts a spotlight on accountability and ethical standards within one of the government’s most vital departments.

DA spokesperson Alexandra Abrahams stated that Minister Tolashe contradicted a Cabinet decision to limit Netshipale’s appointment to one year due to his age, which exceeds the standard retirement threshold for public servants. Cabinet records from March show that the one-year contract carried a remuneration package of R2.259 million per annum.

The department has recently faced internal turmoil including suspensions, secondments, and staff reshuffles, many of which insiders say were influenced by the minister in coordination with Netshipale. Netshipale, who was appointed seven months ago, is now facing allegations of gross dishonesty, dereliction of duty, and bringing the department into disrepute.

An internal letter from Minister Tolashe instructed Netshipale to provide written representations by October 20, warning that failure to "take responsibility" could result in dismissal to safeguard the dignity of her office. The minister had reportedly issued a five-year contract despite warnings from senior officials that it contravened regulations.

In Parliament, Tolashe told the DA that Netshipale’s contract was for five years and in line with prevailing regulations, a statement the DA now alleges is misleading. An internal departmental memo later confirmed that the contract had been adjusted to one year and emphasized that the Cabinet decision was binding. The minister’s subsequent letter directly accused Netshipale of unilaterally extending his contract without her knowledge.

Abrahams highlighted that Tolashe allegedly interfered in recruitment processes, favouring certain individuals and appointing unqualified staff to key positions, raising concerns of nepotism and favoritism. The DA argues that such actions undermine ethical governance and the department’s ability to serve South Africa’s most vulnerable citizens.

“The Department of Social Development manages a budget of R294 billion and is responsible for the payment of social grants,” said Abrahams. “Leadership failures at this level directly affect service delivery and public trust.” The DA has called for the parliamentary ethics committee to thoroughly investigate the minister’s conduct and hold her accountable if found guilty.

As scrutiny continues, this case underscores broader questions of leadership, transparency, and accountability in South Africa’s public service.